[PATCH 02/24] spi: spi-mem: Add a new controller capability

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 06:14:39PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> There are spi devices with multiple frequency limitations depending on
> the invoked command. We probably do not want to afford running at the
> lowest supported frequency all the time, so if we want to get the most
> of our hardware, we need to allow per-operation frequency limitations.

This all makes sense to me.  I'll leave it a little bit to see if anyone
(especially people working with the individual devices) has any thoughts
and assuming no issues apply the SPI bits on a branch.  Does that sound
sensible?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20241028/2b6b91d9/attachment.sig>