[PATCH 20/24] spi: spi-mem: Reorder SPI_MEM_OP_CMD internals
Tudor Ambarus
tudor.ambarus at linaro.org
Mon Nov 11 06:32:27 PST 2024
On 10/25/24 5:14 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Follow the order used by all the other similar macros:
> - nbytes
> - value/buffer
> - buswidth
> - other fields
>
> There is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
> ---
> include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> index 379c048b2eb4..318ea7b193cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@
>
> #define SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(__opcode, __buswidth) \
> { \
> - .buswidth = __buswidth, \
> - .opcode = __opcode, \
> .nbytes = 1, \
> + .opcode = __opcode, \
> + .buswidth = __buswidth, \
> }
>
I don't mind, but shouldn't we follow the order used at struct declaration?
struct spi_mem_op {
struct {
u8 nbytes;
u8 buswidth;
u8 dtr : 1;
u8 __pad : 7;
u16 opcode;
} cmd;
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list