[PATCH 2/2] eeprom: 93xx46: drop unneeded MODULE_ALIAS
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at intel.com
Fri May 10 07:28:24 PDT 2024
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 09:17:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/05/2024 21:11, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 20:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 08/05/2024 20:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:15:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On 08/05/2024 19:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 05:49:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>>> The ID table already has respective entry and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE and
> >>>>>> creates proper alias for SPI driver. Having another MODULE_ALIAS causes
> >>>>>> the alias to be duplicated.
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>>>> MODULE_ALIAS("spi:93xx46");
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was stumbled over this (leftover?).
> >>>>> Commit message doesn't elaborate this bit.
> >>>>> Any comments?
> >>>>
> >>>> It is not present in ID table and commit msg removes only duplicated
> >>>> aliases. That alias has meaning - someone might be actually relying on it.
> >>>
> >>> It seems no users for it. The only user of platform data of this EEPROM uses
> >>> board files which AFAIU bypasses modalias matching.
> >>
> >> I don't think that's correct. The modalias of SPI board is there on
> >> purpose.
> >
> > Right, but I think a better workaround would have been to change
> > the board_info to pick a modalias that is part of the ID table:
> >
> > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/digsy_mtc_eeprom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/digsy_mtc_eeprom.c
> > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table eeprom_spi_gpiod_table = {
> >
> > static struct spi_board_info digsy_mtc_eeprom_info[] __initdata = {
> > {
> > - .modalias = "93xx46",
> > + .modalias = "eeprom-93xx46",
> > .max_speed_hz = 1000000,
> > .bus_num = EE_SPI_BUS_NUM,
> > .chip_select = 0,
> >
>
> That's kind of independent change.
I have done similar change in my patch series, after which I am 100% sure the
modalias can be removed. Can you look at that?
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508184905.2102633-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
> This commit *only* removed duplicated
> aliases, thus should have not functional impact except dropping
> redundant code. What you propose is to change spi board matching, which
> is reasonable, just a different thing.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list