[PATCH 2/2] eeprom: 93xx46: drop unneeded MODULE_ALIAS

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 20:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/05/2024 20:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:15:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2024 19:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 05:49:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> The ID table already has respective entry and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE and
>>>>> creates proper alias for SPI driver.  Having another MODULE_ALIAS causes
>>>>> the alias to be duplicated.
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>>>>>  MODULE_ALIAS("spi:93xx46");
>>>>
>>>> I was stumbled over this (leftover?).
>>>> Commit message doesn't elaborate this bit.
>>>> Any comments?
>>>
>>> It is not present in ID table and commit msg removes only duplicated
>>> aliases. That alias has meaning - someone might be actually relying on it.
>> 
>> It seems no users for it. The only user of platform data of this EEPROM uses
>> board files which AFAIU bypasses modalias matching.
>
> I don't think that's correct. The modalias of SPI board is there on
> purpose. 

Right, but I think a better workaround would have been to change
the board_info to pick a modalias that is part of the ID table:

--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/digsy_mtc_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/digsy_mtc_eeprom.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table eeprom_spi_gpiod_table = {
 
 static struct spi_board_info digsy_mtc_eeprom_info[] __initdata = {
        {
-               .modalias               = "93xx46",
+               .modalias               = "eeprom-93xx46",
                .max_speed_hz           = 1000000,
                .bus_num                = EE_SPI_BUS_NUM,
                .chip_select            = 0,


    Arnd