[PATCH v3 2/2] ubi: Implement ioctl for detailed erase counters
Richard Weinberger
richard at nod.at
Sat Dec 7 00:06:29 PST 2024
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1 at huawei.com>
> An: "Rickard X Andersson" <rickard.andersson at axis.com>, "richard" <richard at nod.at>, "linux-mtd"
> 在 2024/12/6 19:51, Rickard Andersson 写道:
>> Currently, "max_ec" can be read from sysfs, which provides a limited
>> view of the flash device’s wear. In certain cases, such as bugs in
>> the wear-leveling algorithm, specific blocks can be worn down more
>> than others, resulting in uneven wear distribution. Also some use cases
>> can wear the erase blocks of the fastmap area more heavily than other
>> parts of flash.
>> Providing detailed erase counter values give a better understanding of
>> the overall flash wear and is needed to be able to calculate for example
>> expected life time.
>> There exists more detailed info in debugfs, but this information is
>> only available for debug builds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson at axis.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> Hi Rickard. Some small nits below.
Please also run checkpatch.pl, there are some coding style issues.
Overall the change looks good to me and can be merged soon!
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c
>> index 0d8f04cf03c5..bcdc47374578 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c
>> @@ -828,6 +828,72 @@ static int rename_volumes(struct ubi_device *ubi,
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int ubi_get_ec_info(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_ecinfo_req __user
>> *ureq)
>> +{
>> + struct ubi_ecinfo_req req;
>> + struct ubi_wl_entry *wl;
>> + int i;
>
> We can use a obvious name like 'read_cnt' or 'read_length', instead of 'i'.
>> + int peb;
>> + int end_peb;
>> +
>> + /* Copy the input arguments */
>> + if (copy_from_user(&req, ureq, sizeof(struct ubi_ecinfo_req)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + /* Check input arguments */
>> + if (req.length <= 0 || req.start < 0)
>
> How about 'if (req.length <= 0 || req.start < 0 || req.start >=
> ubi->peb_count)'? Then 'if (req.start > end_peb)' below can be deleted.
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (check_add_overflow(req.start, req.length, &end_peb))
>
> How about 'if (unlikely(check_add_overflow(req.start, req.length,
> &end_peb)))' ?
Well, this is not a hot path. What is the benefit of an unlikely() here?
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (end_peb > ubi->peb_count)
>> + end_peb = ubi->peb_count;
>> +
>> + if (req.start > end_peb)
>
> This check can be removed.
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* Check access rights before filling erase_counters array */
>> + if (!access_ok(ureq->erase_counters, (end_peb-req.start) * sizeof(int32_t)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>
> We can use 'put_user' below to replace the check 'access_ok'.
Depending on the architecture, access_ok() can bit rather expensive.
That's why using access_ok() once on the whole range and then using
the cheap __put_user() in loops is a common pattern.
>
> for (peb = req.start; peb < end_peb; i++, peb++) {
> int ec = UBI_UNKNOWN;
>
> if (!ubi_io_is_bad(ubi, peb)) {
> spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> wl = ubi->lookuptbl[peb];
> if (wl)
> ec = wl->ec;
> else
> ec = UBI_UNKNOWN;
> spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> }
>
> if (unlikely(put_user(ec, ureq->erase_counters+i)))
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
>> +
>> + /* Fill erase counter array */
>> + i = 0;
>> + for (peb = req.start; peb < end_peb; i++, peb++) {
>> + int ec;
>> +
>> + if (ubi_io_is_bad(ubi, peb)) {
>> + if (__put_user(UBI_UNKNOWN, ureq->erase_counters+i))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
>> +
>> + wl = ubi->lookuptbl[peb];
>> + if (wl)
>> + ec = wl->ec;
>> + else
>> + ec = UBI_UNKNOWN;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
>> +
>> + if (__put_user(ec, ureq->erase_counters+i))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + }
>
>
>> +
>> + /* Return actual read length */
>> + req.read_length = i;
>> +
>> + /* Copy everything except erase counter array */
>> + if (copy_to_user(ureq, &req, sizeof(struct ubi_ecinfo_req)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>
> if (unlikely(...
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static long ubi_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> @@ -991,6 +1057,12 @@ static long ubi_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
>> cmd,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + case UBI_IOCECNFO:
>> + {
>> + err = ubi_get_ec_info(ubi, argp);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> default:
>> err = -ENOTTY;
>> break;
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list