[PATCH V2] dt-bindings: nvmem: move deprecated cells binding to its own file

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:40:18AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
> 
> Support for old NVMEM fixed cells was deprecated in favour of
> "fixed-layout". It's still part of the nvmem.yaml though and may be
> unknowingly used by new bindings added without much of analyze.
> 
> To make it more difficult to accidentally support old syntax move its
> binding to separated file with "deprecated" in its name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
> ---
> V2: Fix path to nvmem-deprecated-cells.yaml in amlogic,meson6-rtc.yaml
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml          |  7 ++++-
>  .../bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml  |  1 +
>  .../nvmem/amlogic,meson-gxbb-efuse.yaml       |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/amlogic,meson6-efuse.yaml  |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/apple,efuses.yaml          |  1 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/imx-ocotp.yaml  |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml        |  1 +
>  .../nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml         |  1 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mxs-ocotp.yaml  |  1 +
>  .../nvmem/nvmem-deprecated-cells.yaml         | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml      |  9 ------
>  .../bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml           |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/qcom,sec-qfprom.yaml       |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/qcom,spmi-sdam.yaml        |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/rockchip,otp.yaml          |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.yaml        |  1 +
>  .../nvmem/socionext,uniphier-efuse.yaml       |  1 +
>  .../bindings/nvmem/sunplus,sp7021-ocotp.yaml  |  1 +
>  .../bindings/rtc/amlogic,meson6-rtc.yaml      |  1 +
>  19 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem-deprecated-cells.yaml

You missed allwinner,sun4i-a10-sid.yaml and at24.yaml 
(arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm53016-meraki-mr32.dts). Maybe we want to 
fix the latter case because at24 will continually have new users.

Rob