[PATCH 01/20] mtd: rawnand: txx9ndfmc: Mark driver struct with __refdata to prevent section mismatch warning

[Miquel Raynal]

Hello,

miquel.raynal at bootlin.com wrote on Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:37:41 +0200:

> Hi Arnd,
> 
> arnd at arndb.de wrote on Mon, 09 Oct 2023 15:01:17 +0200:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 14:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> > >> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 10:43:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:    
> > >> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 09:22, Masahiro Yamada wrote:      
> > >> > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:02 AM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> > Can we instead question the use of module_platform_driver_probe()?    
> > > I don't have the history in mind, but why not just switch to regular
> > > module_platform_driver() registration instead? It seems like the
> > > original authors just did not care about the remove path and were
> > > happy to skip its implementation.
> > >
> > > On mtd devices one can argue that the flash underlying stores the
> > > rootfs and thus cannot be removed, but I believe today this is a
> > > questionable (software) design.    
> > 
> > It was changed to module_platform_driver_probe() in commit
> > 3a2a13fa902d2 ("mtd: txx9ndfmc: use module_platform_driver_probe()")
> > with a short changelog text:
> > 
> > commit 3a2a13fa902d232a1e56582647aed6cb2591349b
> > Author: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
> > Date:   Tue Mar 5 13:31:24 2013 +0900
> > 
> >     mtd: txx9ndfmc: use module_platform_driver_probe()
> >     
> >     This patch uses module_platform_driver_probe() macro which makes
> >     the code smaller and simpler.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse at intel.com>
> > 
> > Instead of just simplifying the code, I think that was actually
> > a bugfix because it prevented both the probe and remove callbacks
> > from getting called after getting dropped (deferred probe or
> > unbind/rebind). Using module_platform_driver() is probably
> > even better here, but then we need to remove both the __init
> > and __exit annotations.  
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl

FYI I've collected all the patches in this series except the txx9ndfmc
ones.

Thanks,
Miquèl