[PATCH v5 1/2] spi: Replace -ENOTSUPP with -EOPNOTSUPP in op checking

[AceLan Kao]

Hi Mika,

Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at linux.intel.com> 於 2023年11月10日 週五 下午1:37寫道：
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 05:43:02PM +0800, AceLan Kao wrote:
> > From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao at canonical.com>
> >
> > No functional changes are introduced by this patch; it's a code cleanup
> > to use the correct error code.
>
> Probably good to mention here that this affect only the "SPI MEM"
> drivers and the core parts. Also you could explain here that the reaosn
> for this is to make sure we use unified "operation not supported" return
> code accross these.
Got it.
>
> Does some kernel-doc need updating as well to make sure the future
> drivers will return the correct one if they do not support given
> optional operations?
I have no idea where to add this, do you mean add a section in
Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao at canonical.com>
> >
> > ---
> > v5. distinguish -EOPNOTSUPP from -ENOTSUPP
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 2 +-
> >  drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c | 2 +-
> >  drivers/spi/spi-ath79.c     | 2 +-
> >  drivers/spi/spi-bcm-qspi.c  | 2 +-
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mem.c       | 6 +++---
> >  drivers/spi/spi-npcm-fiu.c  | 2 +-
> >  drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c   | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/spi/spi-wpcm-fiu.c  | 2 +-
>
> I think you should include the SPI subsystem maintainer as well, at
> least for visibility.
Right, I should CC them.