[PATCH 10/22] microblaze: include linux/cpu.h for trap_init() prototype

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Arnd,

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:07 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, at 21:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:01 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at kernel.org> wrote:
> >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> >>
> >> Microblaze runs into a single -Wmissing-prototypes warning when that is
> >> enabled:
> >>
> >> arch/microblaze/kernel/traps.c:21:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'trap_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >>
> >> Include the right header to avoid this.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> >>  arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c      | 1 +
> >>  arch/csky/include/asm/traps.h  | 2 --
> >>  arch/csky/kernel/traps.c       | 1 +
> >>  arch/m68k/coldfire/vectors.c   | 3 +--
> >>  arch/m68k/coldfire/vectors.h   | 3 ---
> >
> > Ah, so this is where the m68k changes listed in the cover letter are
> > hiding ;-)
> >
> >>  arch/microblaze/kernel/traps.c | 1 +
> >>  arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c   | 1 +
> >>  arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c   | 1 +
> >>  arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h   | 1 -
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c        | 1 +
> >>  10 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>  delete mode 100644 arch/m68k/coldfire/vectors.h
> >
> > Obviously the non-microblaze changes should be spun off in separate
> > patches.
>
> I messed up one of my rebases here and accidentally sent
> the wrong changelog text. My intention was to have the
> combined patch but with this text:
>
>     arch: include linux/cpu.h for trap_init() prototype
>
>     some architectures run into a -Wmissing-prototypes warning
>     for trap_init()
>
>     arch/microblaze/kernel/traps.c:21:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'trap_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
>     Include the right header to avoid this consistently, removing
>     the extra declarations on m68k and x86 that were added as local
>     workarounds already.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>

That makes sense, although it's hard to combine this with "my preference
would be for the patches to make it through the respective subsystem
maintainer trees"...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds