[RFC PATCH 1/5] mtd: nand: ecc-qcom: Add support for ECC Engine Driver

[Md Sadre Alam]

On 10/31/2023 10:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/10/2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> 
> Eh? Empty?

QPIC controller has the ecc pipelined so will keep the ecc support
inlined in both raw nand and serial nand driver.

Droping this driver since device node was NAK-ed
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg177596.html
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam at quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara at quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig    |   7 ++
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile   |   1 +
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-qcom.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-qcom.c
>>
> 
> ...
> 
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_ecc_config);
>> +
>> +void qcom_ecc_enable(struct qcom_ecc *ecc)
>> +{
>> +	ecc->use_ecc = true;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_ecc_enable);
> 
> Drop this and all other exports. Nothing here explains the need for them.
> 
>> +
>> +void qcom_ecc_disable(struct qcom_ecc *ecc)
>> +{
>> +	ecc->use_ecc = false;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_ecc_disable);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id qpic_ecc_dt_match[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc",
> 
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
> 
> Checkpatch is preerquisite. Don't send patches which have obvious issues
> pointed out by checkpatch. It's a waste of reviewers time.
> 
>> +	},
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int qpic_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	struct qpic_ecc *ecc;
>> +	u32 max_eccdata_size;
>> +
>> +	ecc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ecc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!ecc)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	ecc->caps = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> +
>> +	ecc->dev = dev;
>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ecc);
>> +	dev_info(dev, "probed\n");
> 
> No, no such messages.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>