[PATCH v2 07/17] dt-bindings: mtd: ingenic: Prevent NAND chip unevaluated properties

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Rob,

robh at kernel.org wrote on Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:20:41 -0600:

> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:33:14AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > 
> > robh at kernel.org wrote on Tue, 06 Jun 2023 12:52:00 -0600:
> >   
> > > On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:52:36 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> > > > List all the possible properties in the NAND chip as per the example and
> > > > set unevaluatedProperties to false in the NAND chip section.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul at crapouillou.net>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,nand.yaml | 4 ++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >     
> > > 
> > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > > 
> > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > > 
> > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,nand.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/raw-nand-chip.yaml  
> > 
> > It seems like your automated tooling failed to apply the second patch
> > in this series (creating raw-nand-chip.yaml). It says "sha1 information
> > is lacking or useless". This work is based on a recent -rc so I'm not
> > sure what is "lacking or useless" in this case.  
> 
> The base used is rc1.

Ack.

> 
> > Anyway, do you plan to give this series a look anyway? Or should I
> > rebase against a specific branch?  
> 
> Yes, I'll leave it in the queue. I'm just getting back after being out a 
> month.

Sure. Good luck with your month-old backlog :)

Thanks,
Miquèl