[PATCH 10/12] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add BCMBCA read data bus interface
William Zhang
william.zhang at broadcom.com
Thu Jun 8 12:04:23 PDT 2023
On 06/07/2023 11:15 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> william.zhang at broadcom.com wrote on Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:12:02 -0700:
>
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 06/07/2023 01:20 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> william.zhang at broadcom.com wrote on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 16:12:50 -0700:
>>>
>>>> The BCMBCA broadband SoC integrates the NAND controller differently than
>>>> STB, iProc and other SoCs. It has different endianness for NAND cache
>>>> data and ONFI parameter data.
>>>>
>>>> Add a SoC read data bus shim for BCMBCA to meet the specific SoC need
>>>> and performance improvement using the optimized memcpy function on NAND
>>>> cache memory.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang at broadcom.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 44 ++++++++++++++-------
>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h | 2 +
>>>> 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c
>>>> index 7e48b6a0bfa2..899103a62c98 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/bcmbca_nand.c
>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ enum {
>>>> BCMBCA_CTLRDY = BIT(4),
>>>> };
>>>> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
>>>> +#define ALIGN_REQ 8
>>>> +#else
>>>> +#define ALIGN_REQ 4
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline bool bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(void *flash_cache, void *buffer)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)buffer, ALIGN_REQ) &&
>>>> + IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)flash_cache, ALIGN_REQ);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static bool bcmbca_nand_intc_ack(struct brcmnand_soc *soc)
>>>> {
>>>> struct bcmbca_nand_soc *priv =
>>>> @@ -56,6 +68,29 @@ static void bcmbca_nand_intc_set(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en)
>>>> brcmnand_writel(val, mmio);
>>>> }
>>>> >> +static void bcmbca_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_soc *soc,
>>>> + void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer,
>>>> + int fc_words, bool is_param)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!is_param) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * memcpy can do unaligned aligned access depending on source
>>>> + * and dest address, which is incompatible with nand cache. Fallback
>>>> + * to the memcpy for io version
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (bcmbca_nand_is_buf_aligned(flash_cache, buffer))
>>>> + memcpy((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4);
>>>> + else
>>>> + memcpy_fromio((void *)buffer, (void *)flash_cache, fc_words * 4);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + /* Flash cache has same endian as the host for parameter pages */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++, buffer++)
>>>> + *buffer = __raw_readl(flash_cache + i * 4);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int bcmbca_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> @@ -75,6 +110,7 @@ static int bcmbca_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> >> soc->ctlrdy_ack = bcmbca_nand_intc_ack;
>>>> soc->ctlrdy_set_enabled = bcmbca_nand_intc_set;
>>>> + soc->read_data_bus = bcmbca_read_data_bus;
>>>> >> return brcmnand_probe(pdev, soc);
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>>>> index d920e88c7f5b..656be4d73016 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>>>> @@ -814,6 +814,30 @@ static inline u32 edu_readl(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl,
>>>> return brcmnand_readl(ctrl->edu_base + offs);
>>>> }
>>>> >> +static inline void brcmnand_read_data_bus(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl,
>>>> + void __iomem *flash_cache, u32 *buffer,
>>>> + int fc_words, bool is_param)
>>>
>>> I strongly dislike this "is_param" boolean.
>>>
>>> When is the data in host endianness? When is it not?
>> This is little bit complicated. We have two type data read from nand cache. One for page read and the other for parameter and onfi data read from the controller side. But it depends on how SoC integrate the nand cache to system. In broadband SoC, both page and parameter data are in host endianess but other SoCs is not the same.
>>
>> I am open to suggestion for is_param function argument but to factor out this common code in more structured way, I don't see other way around.
>
> Alright, so this is SoC dependent, very well -> a (sub)compatible per
> SoC + platform data associated to it with the right function.
>
Right we have per SoC compatible and can have per SoC implementation but
I prefer to have a default implementation in the brcmnand.c because
right now only bcmcba SoC need some different handling. The other four
implementations are the same.
To make the code a little more readable and less complicated, I am
thinking to separate the brcmnand_read_data_bus into
brcmnand_read_page_data and brcmnand_read_param_data as default in
brcmnand.c. But bcmbca will override them. Would that be okay with you?
>>> If we think about an exec_op() conversion and drop cmdfunc(), what
>>> would be the discriminant?
>>>
>> If we need to implement exec_op in the future, the data is not coming from nand cache but some other low level data register which may not subject to the endianess issue.
>
> Can't you use the same cache all the time here as well then? And avoid
> the need for this overly complex logic?
>
Unfortunately exec_op will not use nand cache for parameter data read
but some other low level data register. This is dictated by the controller.
>>
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct brcmnand_soc *soc = ctrl->soc;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (soc->read_data_bus) {
>>>> + soc->read_data_bus(soc, flash_cache, buffer, fc_words, is_param);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + if (!is_param) {
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++, buffer++)
>>>> + *buffer = brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < fc_words; i++)
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Flash cache is big endian for parameter pages, at
>>>> + * least on STB SoCs
>>>> + */
>>>> + buffer[i] = be32_to_cpu(brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i));
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static void brcmnand_clear_ecc_addr(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
>>>> {
>>>> >> @@ -1811,20 +1835,11 @@ static void brcmnand_cmdfunc(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned command,
>>>> native_cmd == CMD_PARAMETER_CHANGE_COL) {
>>>> /* Copy flash cache word-wise */
>>>> u32 *flash_cache = (u32 *)ctrl->flash_cache;
>>>> - int i;
>>>> >> brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(ctrl->soc, true);
>>>> >> - /*
>>>> - * Must cache the FLASH_CACHE now, since changes in
>>>> - * SECTOR_SIZE_1K may invalidate it
>>>> - */
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < FC_WORDS; i++)
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * Flash cache is big endian for parameter pages, at
>>>> - * least on STB SoCs
>>>> - */
>>>> - flash_cache[i] = be32_to_cpu(brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, i));
>>>> + brcmnand_read_data_bus(ctrl, ctrl->nand_fc, flash_cache,
>>>> + FC_WORDS, true);
>>>> >> brcmnand_soc_data_bus_unprepare(ctrl->soc, true);
>>>> >> @@ -2137,7 +2152,7 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>>>> {
>>>> struct brcmnand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>>>> struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>>>> - int i, j, ret = 0;
>>>> + int i, ret = 0;
>>>> >> brcmnand_clear_ecc_addr(ctrl);
>>>> >> @@ -2150,8 +2165,9 @@ static int brcmnand_read_by_pio(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>>>> if (likely(buf)) {
>>>> brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(ctrl->soc, false);
>>>> >> - for (j = 0; j < FC_WORDS; j++, buf++)
>>>> - *buf = brcmnand_read_fc(ctrl, j);
>>>> + brcmnand_read_data_bus(ctrl, ctrl->nand_fc, buf,
>>>> + FC_WORDS, false);
>>>> + buf += FC_WORDS;
>>>> >> brcmnand_soc_data_bus_unprepare(ctrl->soc, false);
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>>>> index f1f93d85f50d..88819bc395f8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ struct brcmnand_soc {
>>>> void (*ctlrdy_set_enabled)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en);
>>>> void (*prepare_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool prepare,
>>>> bool is_param);
>>>> + void (*read_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, void __iomem *flash_cache,
>>>> + u32 *buffer, int fc_words, bool is_param);
>>>> const struct brcmnand_io_ops *ops;
>>>> };
>>>> > >
>>> Thanks,
>>> Miquèl
>>>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4212 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20230608/1163d364/attachment.p7s>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list