[PATCH v1 01/11] PCI: tegra: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get
Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 15:49:42 PDT 2022
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:19:02AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:53 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> > [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> > a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API. It may even
> > help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
> > gpios described by swnodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> > index 8e323e93be91..929f9363e94b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> > @@ -2202,10 +2202,11 @@ static int tegra_pcie_parse_dt(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> > * and in this case fall back to using AFI per port register
> > * to toggle PERST# SFIO line.
> > */
> > - rp->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(dev, port,
> > - "reset-gpios", 0,
> > - GPIOD_OUT_LOW,
> > - label);
> > + rp->reset_gpio = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(dev,
> > + of_fwnode_handle(port),
> > + "reset",
> > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW,
> > + label);
>
> Why in pci-aardvark.c for PERST# reset-gpio you have used
> devm_gpiod_get_optional() and here in pci-tegra.c you have used
> devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()? I think that PERST# logic is same in both
> drivers.
I believe Andy already answered that, but in this driver we can have
several root ports described via subnodes of dev->of_node, and reset
GPIOs are attached to those subnodes. We are forced to use
devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() instead of devm_gpiod_get_optional() as we need
to supply the exact fwnode we need to look up GPIO in, and can not infer
it from the 'dev' parameter of devm_gpiod_get().
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list