[PATCH v1 10/11] watchdog: bd9576_wdt: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
Guenter Roeck
linux at roeck-us.net
Mon Sep 5 08:13:39 PDT 2022
On 9/5/22 04:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:33 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
>> so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
>> fwnode property API.
>>
>> While at it switch the rest of the calls to read properties in
>
> it, switch
>
>> bd9576_wdt_probe() to the generic device property API as well.
>
> ...
>
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> struct device *parent = dev->parent;
>
> can make your code slightly neater.
>
> ...
>
>> + count = device_property_count_u32(dev->parent, "rohm,hw-timeout-ms");
>> + if (count < 0 && count != -EINVAL)
>> + return count;
>> +
>> + if (count > 0) {
>
>> + if (count > ARRAY_SIZE(hw_margin))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Why double check? You may move it out of the (count > 0).
>
Two checks will always be needed, so I don't entirely see
how that would be better.
> ...
>
>> - if (ret == 1)
>> - hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0];
>
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev->parent,
>> + "rohm,hw-timeout-ms",
>> + hw_margin, count);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>
> So, only this needs the count > 0 check since below already has it implicitly.
>
Sorry, I don't understand this comment.
Guenter
>> - if (ret == 2) {
>> - hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1];
>> - hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0];
>> + if (count == 1)
>> + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[0];
>> +
>> + if (count == 2) {
>> + hw_margin_max = hw_margin[1];
>> + hw_margin_min = hw_margin[0];
>> + }
>> }
>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list