[PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: marvell-nand: Convert to YAML DT scheme

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 26/10/2022 17:57, Vadym Kochan wrote:
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clocks:
>>
>> What happened to maxItems here? This is wrong. You keep changing random
>> things, again. V3 was correct.
>>
> 
> It is not random, I tried to enforce to use 2 clocks for A7k/8K case.

I think I gave you example how these clocks are being enforced, but
let's paste it here one more time:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,exynos7-clock.yaml#L38

If you have always two clocks, you just put here maxItems and skip the
allOf:if:then.

If you have here for some variants one clock, for some two, then define
wide constraints here and narrow them for each variant in allOf:if:then
("else:")

> 
>>
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Shall reference the NAND controller clocks, the second one is
>>> +      is only needed for the Armada 7K/8K SoCs
>>> +
>>> +  clock-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: core
>>> +      - const: reg
>>> +
>>> +  dmas:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  dma-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: rxtx
>>> +
>>> +  marvell,system-controller:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> +    description: Syscon node that handles NAND controller related registers
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  "^nand@[0-3]$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      reg:
>>> +        minimum: 0
>>> +        maximum: 3
>>> +
>>> +      nand-rb:
>>> +        minimum: 0
>>> +        maximum: 1
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-strength:
>>> +        enum: [1, 4, 8]
>>> +
>>> +      nand-on-flash-bbt: true
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-mode: true
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-algo:
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          This property is essentially useful when not using hardware ECC.
>>> +          Howerver, it may be added when using hardware ECC for clarification
>>> +          but will be ignored by the driver because ECC mode is chosen depending
>>> +          on the page size and the strength required by the NAND chip.
>>> +          This value may be overwritten with nand-ecc-strength property.
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-step-size:
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          Marvell's NAND flash controller does use fixed strength
>>> +          (1-bit for Hamming, 16-bit for BCH), so the actual step size
>>> +          will shrink or grow in order to fit the required strength.
>>> +          Step sizes are not completely random for all and follow certain
>>> +          patterns described in AN-379, "Marvell SoC NFC ECC".
>>> +
>>> +      label:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>>> +
>>> +      partitions:
>>> +        type: object
>>
>> That's not what I asked for. Like four times I asked you to add here
>> unevaluatedProperties: false and I never said that ref to partition.yaml
>> should be removed and you... instead remove that ref.
>>
>> You need to define here children and specify their ref.
>>
>> You must use unevaluatedProperties: false here. So this is fifth time I
>> am writing this feedback.
>>
>>
> 
> It is a bit confusing that it is needed to define "partitions" and "label" rules particulary
> in this nand controller instead of some common place like nand-chip.yaml, these properties
> are common also for the other nand controllers.

No one speaks about label, I never commented about label, I think...

If you think the property is really generic and every NAND controller
bindings implement it, then feel free to include them there, in a
separate patch. It sounds sensible, but I did not check other bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof