[PATCH 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: mtk-snfi: add two timing delay property

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Wed Nov 30 00:35:04 PST 2022


On 30/11/2022 09:18, Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜) wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 08:47 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 03:50, Xiangsheng Hou (侯祥胜) wrote:
>>
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
>>>>> snfi.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-
>>>>> snfi.yaml
>>>>> @@ -55,6 +55,22 @@ properties:
>>>>>      description: device-tree node of the accompanying ECC
>>>>> engine.
>>>>>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>>>  
>>>>> +  rx-sample-delay:
>>>>
>>>> No, use existing property, don't invent your own stuff - missing
>>>> unit
>>>> suffix. See spi-peripheral-props.yaml.
>>>
>>> Will change to other private property. The read sample delay with
>>> MediaTek SPI NAND controller can be set with values from 0 to 47.
>>> However, it`s difficult to say the unit of each vaule, because the
>>> unit
>>> value will be difference with different chip process or different
>>> corner IC.
>>
>> Why you cannot use same formula as other SPI drivers for sample-
>> delay?
>> And divide/multiple by some factor specific to SoC, which is taken
>> from
>> driver_data?
> 
> Even for specific SoC, the unit of sample delay may be various with
> different corner IC.

Which is easy to achieve with driver_data as I said.

> Besides, whether it`s acceptable by change the property rx-sample-delay 
> and rx-latch-latency to mediatek,rx-sample-delay and mediatek,rx-latch-
> latency?

Not for sample delay, because you should use existing properties. Your
driver implementation is not usually argument to duplicate properties in
the bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list