[PATCH] mtd: onenand: omap2: add dependency on GPMC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 07/11/2022 09:44, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 04/11/2022 21:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> OMAP2 OneNAND driver uses gpmc_omap_onenand_set_timings() provided by
>> OMAP GPMC driver, so the latter cannot be module if OneNAND driver is
>> built-in:
>>
>>   /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_omap2.o: in function `omap2_onenand_probe':
>>   onenand_omap2.c:(.text+0x520): undefined reference to `gpmc_omap_onenand_set_timings'
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>> Fixes: 854fd9209b20 ("memory: omap-gpmc: Allow building as a module")
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>> index 34d9a7a82ad4..fa94c514626d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
>>  	tristate "OneNAND on OMAP2/OMAP3 support"
>>  	depends on ARCH_OMAP2 || ARCH_OMAP3 || (COMPILE_TEST && ARM)
>>  	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
>> +	depends on OMAP_GPMC || !OMAP_GPMC
> 
> Why did you add !OMAP_GPMC?
> 
> If OMAP_GPMC is not set we don't want to be able to build this driver correct?

It will build fine because of stubs, so building is not a problem. We
just want to forbid having this built-in if OMAP_GPMC is a module. The
question is whether this is a runtime dependency as well?

Best regards,
Krzysztof