[PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: SPI: Add Ingenic SFC bindings.

[Mark Brown]

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 02:47:14AM +0800, Mike Yang wrote:
> On 7/24/22 01:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/07/2022 18:50, Zhou Yanjie wrote:

> >> No offense, does it really need to be named that way?
> >> I can't seem to find documentation with instructions on this :(

...

> > All bindings are to follow this rule, so I don't understand why you
> > think it is an exception for you?

> Zhou didn't ask you to make an exception. They have a valid
> point and they're asking why.

> You may want to avoid further incidents of this kind by stop
> being bossy and actually writing a guideline of naming these
> .yaml files and publish it somewhere online.

Yeah, I do have to say that I was also completely unaware that
there was any enforced convention here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20220723/79f47b0d/attachment.sig>