[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: add n25q00 schema
Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com
Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com
Tue Oct 5 04:59:06 PDT 2021
On 9/23/21 9:59 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> +Tudor
>
> On 20/09/21 02:41PM, Paweł Anikiel wrote:
>> Add schema for the n25q00 NOR flash memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paweł Anikiel <pan at semihalf.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
>> index ed590d7c6e37..efb3c5e05c5a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ properties:
>> - items:
>> - pattern: "^((((micron|spansion|st),)?\
>> (m25p(40|80|16|32|64|128)|\
>> - n25q(32b|064|128a11|128a13|256a|512a|164k)))|\
>> + n25q(00|32b|064|128a11|128a13|256a|512a|164k)))|\
>
> IIUC this is supposed to only be for legacy/old flashes that started out
> using flash-specific compatibles. Any new flashes should simply use
> jedec,spi-nor unless there is a legitimate reason to do so.
that's correct, the generic compatible should suffice for these flashes.
>
> Until you justify that reason,
>
> Nacked-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav at ti.com>
I agree.
Cheers,
ta
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list