[PATCH v2 10/35] mtd: spi-nor: sst: Use flash late_init() for locking
Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com
Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com
Fri Oct 1 04:43:16 PDT 2021
On 8/16/21 10:09 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 27/07/21 07:51AM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Locking ops are not discoverable via SFDP, use late_init() call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus at microchip.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav at ti.com>
>
> One question though. Have you tested these flashes (this one and the
> ones in the previous patch) to make sure you are not causing any
> regressions? While I don't see anything wrong with the patches, it would
> be good to have some test reports.
sst26vf064b was tested, I thought I specified it in the cover letter.
I haven't tested locking, but will do. It's not a tragedy if we slip few
bugs anyway, we're here to squash them.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c
>> index 980f4c09c91d..29d100febdbf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c
>> @@ -46,15 +46,11 @@ static const struct spi_nor_locking_ops sst26vf_locking_ops = {
>> .is_locked = sst26vf_is_locked,
>> };
>>
>> -static void sst26vf_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor)
>> +static void sst26vf_late_init(struct spi_nor *nor)
>> {
>> nor->params->locking_ops = &sst26vf_locking_ops;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct spi_nor_fixups sst26vf_fixups = {
>> - .default_init = sst26vf_default_init,
>> -};
>> -
>> static const struct flash_info sst_parts[] = {
>> /* SST -- large erase sizes are "overlays", "sectors" are 4K */
>> { "sst25vf040b", INFO(0xbf258d, 0, 64 * 1024, 8,
>> @@ -88,7 +84,7 @@ static const struct flash_info sst_parts[] = {
>> { "sst26vf064b", INFO(0xbf2643, 0, 64 * 1024, 128,
>> SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
>> SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_SWP_IS_VOLATILE)
>> - .fixups = &sst26vf_fixups },
>> + .late_init = sst26vf_late_init},
>> };
>>
>> static int sst_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav
> Texas Instruments Inc.
>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list