[PATCH] mtd: require write permissions for locking and badblock ioctls
Richard Weinberger
richard at nod.at
Wed Mar 3 16:17:16 GMT 2021
Michael,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> An: "Michael Walle" <michael at walle.cc>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>, "Miquel Raynal"
> <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>, "richard" <richard at nod.at>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr at ti.com>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 17:08:56
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] mtd: require write permissions for locking and badblock ioctls
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:57:35PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
>> MEMLOCK, MEMUNLOCK and OTPLOCK modify protection bits. Thus require
>> write permission. Depending on the hardware MEMLOCK might even be
>> write-once, e.g. for SPI-NOR flashes with their WP# tied to GND. OTPLOCK
>> is always write-once.
>>
>> MEMSETBADBLOCK modifies the bad block table.
>>
>> Fixes: f7e6b19bc764 ("mtd: properly check all write ioctls for permissions")
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks for auditing the rest of these from my original patch. If this
> is ok with userspace tools, it's fine with me, but I don't even have
> this hardware to test with :)
That's my fear. Michael, did you verify?
In general you need to be root to open these device files.
So, I don't see a security problem here.
Thanks,
//richard
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list