[RFC 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: dealing with reused JEDEC id c22016

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 21/06/2021 17.23, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> We use the Macronix chip mx25l3233f in a number of
> products.
> 
> Unfortunately, it has the same JEDEC id as another chip which is
> already listed in macronix_parts[]. Since that other one does not
> support SFDP, and its data sheet warns against issuing commands not
> explicitly listed, we can't just do RDSFDP anyway and decide that it's
> an mx25l3205d when the chip returns garbage.
> 
> For lack of better alternative, start allowing multiple entries with
> the same JEDEC id in the parts tables. That allows a correctly written
> device tree to specify the right chip, without being overruled by the
> "JEDEC knows better" heuristic, while being backwards-compatible (as
> long as new chips with recycled ids get added after the existing
> ones).
> 
> While a step forward, this isn't quite a complete solution for our case:
> 
> Some of our platforms are based on LS1021A, thus using the
> spi-fsl-qspi driver. Back in the 4.19 kernel, when the driver was
> fsl-quadspi, we couldn't get the flash recognized unless we
> monkey-patch-replaced the mx25l3205d entry with the mx25l3233f one
> (i.e. added the SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ bits) - we'd
> fail in spi_nor_select_read() because
> shared_hwcaps&SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_MASK would be empty. In contrast, with
> current master, the chip works with or without the third patch in this
> series, i.e. whether it is detected as a mx25l3205d or mx25l3233f. But
> the read performance is ~3 times worse than in our patched 4.19 - I
> haven't quite figured out why quad read doesn't seem to be used or
> work.

Sorry about that last part, that's a PEBKAC. Adding proper
spi-rx-bus-width = <4> properties to DT got the performance back to what
it used to be.

However, I still do need the flashes to be recognized as mx25l3233f and
not mx25l3205d.

Rasmus