[PATCH v5 3/5] mtd: spi-nor: otp: return -EROFS if region is read-only

Michael Walle michael at walle.cc
Fri Jun 4 06:15:36 PDT 2021


Am 2021-06-04 15:07, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com:
> On 6/4/21 1:02 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know 
>> the content is safe
>> 
>> SPI NOR flashes will just ignore program commands if the OTP region is
>> locked. Thus, a user might not notice that the intended write didn't 
>> end
>> up in the flash. Return -EROFS to the user in this case. From what I 
>> can
>> tell, chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c also return this error code.
>> 
>> One could optimize spi_nor_mtd_otp_range_is_locked() to read the 
>> status
>> register only once and not for every OTP region, but for that we would
>> need some more invasive changes. Given that this is
>> one-time-programmable memory and the normal access mode is reading, we
>> just live with the small overhead.
>> 
>> Fixes: 069089acf88b ("mtd: spi-nor: add OTP support")
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
>> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav at ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c
>> index 3898ed67ba1c..063f8fb68649 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c
>> @@ -249,6 +249,32 @@ static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_info(struct mtd_info 
>> *mtd, size_t len,
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>> 
>> +static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_range_is_locked(struct spi_nor *nor, 
>> loff_t ofs,
>> +                                          size_t len)
>> +{
>> +       const struct spi_nor_otp_ops *ops = nor->params->otp.ops;
>> +       unsigned int region;
>> +       int locked;
>> +
>> +       if (!len)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
> 
> You won't need this if you put patch 4/5 before this one. With this:

This patch will get backported to the stable kernels. Patch 4 on the
other hand does not.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus at microchip.com>
> 
>> +       /*
>> +        * If any of the affected OTP regions are locked the entire 
>> range is
>> +        * considered locked.
>> +        */
>> +       for (region = spi_nor_otp_offset_to_region(nor, ofs);
>> +            region <= spi_nor_otp_offset_to_region(nor, ofs + len - 
>> 1);
>> +            region++) {
>> +               locked = ops->is_locked(nor, region);
>> +               /* take the branch it is locked or in case of an error 
>> */
>> +               if (locked)
>> +                       return locked;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_read_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t 
>> ofs,
>>                                       size_t total_len, size_t 
>> *retlen,
>>                                       const u8 *buf, bool is_write)
>> @@ -271,6 +297,16 @@ static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_read_write(struct 
>> mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
>>         /* don't access beyond the end */
>>         total_len = min_t(size_t, total_len, spi_nor_otp_size(nor) - 
>> ofs);
>> 
>> +       if (is_write) {
>> +               ret = spi_nor_mtd_otp_range_is_locked(nor, ofs, 
>> total_len);
>> +               if (ret < 0) {
>> +                       goto out;
>> +               } else if (ret) {
>> +                       ret = -EROFS;
>> +                       goto out;
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>>         *retlen = 0;
>>         while (total_len) {
>>                 /*
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>> 



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list