[PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add support for mx66lm1g45g

[Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com]

On 12/20/21 12:16 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi Tudor,
> 
> On 17/12/21 12:38PM, Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com wrote:
>> On 12/17/21 1:38 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 09/12/21 09:04PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>> mx66lm1g45g supports just 1-1-1, 8-8-8 and 8d-8d-8d modes. There are
>>>> versions of mx66lm1g45g which do not support SFDP, thus use
>>>> SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP. The RDID command issued through the octal peripheral
>>>> interface outputs data always in STR mode for whatever reason. Since
>>>
>>> Huh! I hope this is a mistake from the chip designers, because if it
>>> isn't they need a stern talking-to ;-)
>>>
>>>> 8d-8d-8s is not common, avoid reading the ID when enabling the octal dtr
>>>> mode. Instead, read back the CR2 to check if the switch was successful.
>>>> Tested in 1-1-1 and 8d-8d-8d modes using sama7g5 QSPI IP.
>>>
>>> Datasheet?
>>
>> MX66LM1G45G datasheet:
>> https://www.macronix.com/Lists/Datasheet/Attachments/7929/MX66LM1G45G,%203V,%201Gb,%20v1.1.pdf
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I see that the RDID waveform holds each byte of the ID for a whole clock
> cycle. So you would read ab ab cd cd ef ef. I've seen this before
> somewhere, and sure enough, digging through my inbox I've found this
> patch [0]. In this read ID is performed but only alternate bytes are
> compared since they are repeated. I think you should do the same. I feel
> like reading/comparing 3 bytes is more "robust".

I didn't want to do the 8D-8D-8S readID because I'm not sure if macronix
generalizes 8D-8D-8S for all its octal flashes. Since 8D-8D-8S is odd,
I felt that reading CR2 is safer. But maybe we'll follow the read CR2
approach when the need arises, so I'll follow Zhengxun's proposal.
> 
> BTW, this patch series also adds support for mx66lm1g45g. You might want
> to use this as reference.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210812150135.4005-2-zhengxunli.mxic@gmail.com/
> 

Right. I will rework it's 01/15 patch and keep Zhengxunli as author, I assume
Zhengxunli sent the proposal before me.

ta