[PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec,spi-nor: document issi,is25wp256

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/08/2021 15:28, Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com wrote:
> On 8/19/21 8:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 19/08/2021 19:28, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>>> + Tudor (you should be listed as a maintainer for this file IMO)
>>>
>>> On 19/08/21 06:59PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Document bindings for the issi,is25wp256 SPI NOR flash.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
>>>> index ed590d7c6e37..0db64ac7dc33 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
>>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties:
>>>>        - items:
>>>>            - enum:
>>>>                - issi,is25lp016d
>>>> +              - issi,is25wp256
>>>
>>> I don't think we want to add any new flash specific compatibles. Why is
>>> "jedec,spi-nor" not enough for you?
>>
>> It's fine for me. I had impression that specific compatibles are still
>> preferred and one of boards is using this one. The other way is to
>> remove this compatible from the board DTS.
>>
> 
> Pratyush is right, we prefer to bind just to the generic "jedec,spi-nor"
> compatible whenever possible.

Thanks for confirming this. I'll fixup the dts.


Best regards,
Krzysztof