[PATCH] mtd: return -ENOMEM when kmalloc failed

[Yang Li]

The driver is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to
specify that a buffer allocation failed. Using the correct error
code is more intuitive

Smatch tool warning:
drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c:333 check_free_sectors() warn: returning -1
instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy
drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c:272 check_free_sectors() warn: returning -1
instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy

No functional change, just more standardized.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci at linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee at linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c | 2 +-
 drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
index af16d34..39d0241 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned int address,
 
 	buf = kmalloc(SECTORSIZE + mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!buf)
-		return -1;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = -1;
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i += SECTORSIZE) {
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c
index 444a77b..fd331bc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int address, int
 
 	buf = kmalloc(SECTORSIZE + mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!buf)
-		return -1;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = -1;
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i += SECTORSIZE) {
-- 
1.8.3.1