[PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: spinand: micron: Generalize the function and structure names

[Boris Brezillon]

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:50:05 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote:

> > > The way OOB
> > > bytes are organized do not seem relevant to me, I think i prefer the
> > > "_4_/_8_" naming,even if it's not very explicit.    
> > 
> > The ECC strength doesn't say anything about the scheme used for ECC
> > bytes placement, and you might end up with 2 different schemes
> > providing the same strength, or the same scheme used for 2 different
> > strengths.  
> 
> So perhaps both should be present in the name?

No, the point was to re-use the same functions for various strengths if
they use the same ECC placement scheme.