Invalid ONFI PARAM PAGE
Marco Felsch
m.felsch at pengutronix.de
Mon Aug 3 05:06:26 EDT 2020
Hi Miquel,
thanks for your response :)
On 20-08-03 10:47, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Marco Felsch <m.felsch at pengutronix.de> wrote on Thu, 30 Jul 2020
> 14:14:25 +0200:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > a customer of us uses micron nand flash devices for their local storage.
> > They are now having some troubles with a few devices. Let me start with
> > the following:
> > 1) We can successfully read the nand id field by:
> > -> select_chip
> > -> cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RESET)
> > -> cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READID) Addr=0x00
> > -> 8times: read_byte(mtd)
> >
> > The NAND device response with the following:
> > nand: id_data[0]: 0x2c
> > nand: id_data[1]: 0xdc
> > nand: id_data[2]: 0x90
> > nand: id_data[3]: 0x95
> > nand: id_data[4]: 0x56
> > nand: id_data[5]: 0x0
> > nand: id_data[6]: 0x0
> > nand: id_data[7]: 0x0
> >
> > Accroding the schematic and the datasheet this is right.
> >
> > 2) To detect the ONFI compatibility we now issue:
> > -> cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READID) Addr=0x20
> >
> > and getting the expected 'O','N','F','I' signature.
> >
> > 3) Now we are trying to Read the PARAM Page by:
> > -> cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_PARAM)
> > -> try to read the the param page and if not successful try to
> > read the copies.
> >
> > Here things getting crazy since we are reading all the time '0xff'.
> >
> > 4) Since Barebox (Bootloader) can't read the ONFI param page we
> > calculate the values as expected from the param page. But now we
> > can't access BBT (not found) nor we are not able to write to the
> > OOB Area (the chip is not write protected).
> >
> > The electrical signals are looking good and since we can retrieve the
> > id-data it should be no PCB bug. Did anyone struggled with such problems
> > too?
> >
> > BTW:
> > I also get '0xff' if I send a READ_UNIQUE_ID command and trying to read
> > the 16 copies of the 32byte unique-id.
> >
> > Any answers are welcome :)
>
> Could you share more details about the situation your customer is
> facing? Did this work before? Is this an update? If yes from what
> version to what version? Also, is this a Linux or Barebox issue?
This issue get's triggered right after the first start-up. Some devices
do work and some of them don't after the production. I think it's not a
Linux nor a Barebox issue. Since Barebox can't find the BBT and all
other stuff I skipped propper Linux tests. I will test if Linux can
identify and setup the chip. But I think Linux will setp into the same
NAND-Issues.
I asked on this ML since you guys are the Experts here and maybe you had
see a 'not full prefactored' NAND device too.
Regards,
Marco
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list