32-bit Amlogic (ARM) SoC: kernel BUG in kfree()
liang.yang at amlogic.com
Wed Apr 10 04:08:17 PDT 2019
On 2019/4/5 12:30, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Liang,
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:44 AM Liang Yang <liang.yang at amlogic.com> wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>> On 2019/3/29 2:03, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>>> Hi Liang,
>>>> I don't think it is caused by a different NAND type, but i have followed
>>>> the some test on my GXL platform. we can see the result from the
>>>> attachment. By the way, i don't find any information about this on meson
>>>> NFC datasheet, so i will ask our VLSI.
>>>> Martin, May you reproduce it with the new patch on meson8b platform ? I
>>>> need a more clear and easier compared log like gxl.txt. Thanks.
>>> your gxl.txt is great, finally I can also compare my own results with
>>> something that works for you!
>>> in my results (see attachment) the "DATA_IN [256 B, force 8-bit]"
>>> instructions result in a different info buffer output.
>>> does this make any sense to you?
>> I have asked our VLSI designer for explanation or simulation result by
>> an e-mail. Thanks.
> do you have any update on this?
> Sorry. I haven't got reply from VLSI designer yet. We tried to improve
priority yesterday, but i still can't estimate the time. There is no
document or change list showing the difference between m8/b and gxl/axg
serial chips. Now it seems that we can't use command NFC_CMD_N2M on nand
initialization for m8/b chips and use *read byte from NFC fifo register*
More information about the linux-mtd