[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mtd: sunxi: Add new compatible
maxime.ripard at bootlin.com
Fri Apr 5 02:56:24 PDT 2019
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com> wrote on Fri, 5 Apr 2019
> 11:13:02 +0200:
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:21:09PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > The A33 NAND controller is slightly different than the A10+ ones,
> > > eg. DMA handling is a bit different and a few register offsets
> > > changed.
> > >
> > > Introduce a new compatible to represent this version of the IP.
> > >
> > > Also append '-controller' to the new compatible (which is required for
> > > new compatibles) as this is describing a NAND controller and not a
> > > NAND chip.
> > Out of curiosity, why are you requiring that suffix now?
> Because people are confused with the terminology and we see people
> mixing all the terms very often: NAND controller, NAND bus, NAND
> chip, ECC engine, etc. This node only describes a NAND controller, so
> let be more precise and stop naming everything just "NAND".
Sounds reasonable :)
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt
> > > index dcd5a5d80dc0..6128d41d8c59 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt
> > > @@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
> > > Allwinner NAND Flash Controller (NFC)
> > >
> > > Required properties:
> > > -- compatible : "allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand".
> > > +- compatible : Must be one of:
> > > + - "allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand"
> > > + - "allwinner,sun8i-a33-nand-controller"
> > > + The former may be used by all IPs, however sun8i family
> > > + will need the second one in order to make use of the
> > > + internal DMA capabilities.
> > I'm not sure we should have that statement. We have no idea whether or
> > not this can be used by all IPs *today*, and we surely don't know
> > about the one that are going to come out.
> Shall I just drop the whole comment ("The former" ... "capabilities.")?
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the linux-mtd