[PATCH v2 04/14] mtd: rawnand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device parameter
Abhishek Sahu
absahu at codeaurora.org
Tue May 8 00:26:13 PDT 2018
On 2018-05-07 13:58, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:50:31 +0530
> Abhishek Sahu <absahu at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in DT.
>> The QPIC/EBI2 NAND supports 4 or 8-bit ECC correction. The same
>> kind of board can have different NAND parts so use the ECC
>> strength from device parameters if it is not specified in DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu at codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> * Changes from v1:
>>
>> 1. Removed the custom logic and used the helper fuction.
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 31
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> index b554fb6..a8d71ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> @@ -2315,13 +2315,21 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct
>> mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> .free = qcom_nand_ooblayout_free,
>> };
>>
>> +static int
>> +qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
>> +{
>> + return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
>> +}
>> +NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
>> + NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
>> +
>> static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
>> {
>> struct nand_chip *chip = &host->chip;
>> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>> struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
>> struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>> - int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
>> + int cwperpage, bad_block_byte, ret;
>> bool wide_bus;
>> int ecc_mode = 1;
>>
>> @@ -2334,8 +2342,20 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct
>> qcom_nand_host *host)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
>
> Looks like you're still expecting nand-ecc-step-size to be defined in
> the DT, which does not really make sense since you only support one
> size: NANDC_STEP_SIZE.
>
> You should remove the
>
> if (ecc->size != NANDC_STEP_SIZE) {
> dev_err(nandc->dev, "invalid ecc size\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> block, then do:
>
> cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
>
> and finally let the nand_ecc_param_setup() function choose the best
> config for you.
>
Correct Boris.
It only supports one step size so we can remove this DT
property. I will make the changes.
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Each CW has 4 available OOB bytes which will be protected with
>> ECC
>> + * so remaining bytes can be used for ECC.
>> + */
>> + ret = nand_ecc_param_setup(chip, &qcom_nandc_ecc_caps,
>> + mtd->oobsize - (cwperpage << 2));
>
> Please stop doing useless optimizations like. That brings nothing and
> obfuscates the code a bit more. You say in the comment that each
> codeword has 4 protected OOB bytes that can be used by the upper layer,
> so just do (cwperpage * 4) and let gcc optimize that for you.
>
Sure. I will change it.
Thanks,
Abhishek
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(nandc->dev, "No valid ecc settings possible\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
>> -
>> if (ecc->strength >= 8) {
>> /* 8 bit ECC defaults to BCH ECC on all platforms */
>> host->bch_enabled = true;
>> @@ -2403,7 +2423,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct
>> qcom_nand_host *host)
>>
>> mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &qcom_nand_ooblayout_ops);
>>
>> - cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
>> nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
>> cwperpage);
>>
>> @@ -2419,12 +2438,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct
>> qcom_nand_host *host)
>> * for 8 bit ECC
>> */
>> host->cw_size = host->cw_data + ecc->bytes;
>> -
>> - if (ecc->bytes * (mtd->writesize / ecc->size) > mtd->oobsize) {
>> - dev_err(nandc->dev, "ecc data doesn't fit in OOB area\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) +
>> 1;
>>
>> host->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list