[PATCH V9 0/4] mtd: read partitions compatible prop for "ofpart" type
Richard Weinberger
richard at nod.at
Sun Mar 11 15:35:06 PDT 2018
Rafał,
Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2018, 21:10:55 CET schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
>
> This patchset provides a proper support for flash device DT node with
> "partitions" subnode using "compatible" property. It's already
> documented in the: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
>
> We believed a previous version 8 was ready to go, but soon after landing
> in the linux-next we got a regression report from Peter.
>
> This version takes a safe path by:
> 1) Respecting parsers order as specified in the default/driver-provided
> list.
> 2) Looking at "compatible" property only when "ofpart" type gets
> speciied.
>
> I double-checked the code and cannot think of any regression this could
> cause. I also hope this design (roughly discussed with Boris) can be
> acceptable for the mtd subsystem.
>
> This is of course 4.17 material at best.
>
> Brian Norris (1):
> mtd: partitions: add of_match_table parser matching
>
> Rafał Miłecki (3):
> mtd: partitions: add special treating for the "ofpart" parser type
> mtd: rename "ofpart" parser to "fixed-partitions" as it fits it better
> mtd: ofpart: add of_match_table with "fixed-partitions"
>
> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 116
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/mtd/ofpart.c |
> 18 +++++--
> include/linux/mtd/partitions.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
As discussed on IRC, 1/4 confused me. It should be squashed into 3/4 to make
sense.
Other than that I think we can merge this patch series.
Not that I'm a super fan of it, but I can see the use-case but don't have an
idea how to solve the problem in a less hacky way. ;-\
Just to be sure, DT guys are also happy with it, right?
Thanks,
//richard
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list