[PATCH v2 0/3] mtd:nor:ppb_unlock fixes
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Tue May 30 02:59:59 PDT 2017
Hi Honza,
On Tue, 30 May 2017 11:51:07 +0200
Honza Petrouš <jpetrous at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> as you advised I come back with v2 patch, now it is the series
> of three fixes I found them during the testing of the original fix.
Just a few things before I start reviewing the patches:
1/ commit title prefix should be "mtd: cfi: " not "mtd:nor:"
2/ Don't know how you send your patches, but patches 1 to 3 should be
"In-Reply-To" your cover letter, which is not the case here.
Normally, git send-email does that automatically.
>
> From the fixes it is evident that PPB unlocking is not so much
> widely used. What is understandable as usually the flashing
> is done in bootloader. At least in projects I was involved before.
>
> Anyway, I can say I tested the code only on one-flashchip
> configuration, so I'm not 100% sure if all will be ok with multichip
> setting. All my old embedded boards have unfortunatelly only
> one nor chip.
>
> As I noted already, the original issue was very slow unlocking
> on Spansion S29GL01GS, what led in really horrible timing,
> sometimes in minutes! With the fix (when only one chip unlock
> cmd is used) the operation returns to the "standard" behaviour
> whats make the whole system happy again.
>
> BR.
> /Honza
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list