[PATCH 3/4] ubifs: don't bother checking for encryption key in ->mmap()
Eric Biggers
ebiggers3 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 23 10:18:07 PDT 2017
Ted + Richard,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:09:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:14:20PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers at google.com>
> > >
> > > Since only an open file can be mmap'ed, and we only allow open()ing an
> > > encrypted file when its key is available, there is no need to check for
> > > the key again before permitting each mmap().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers at google.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard at nod.at>
>
> There are some patches that were sent to linux-fscrypt (including this
> one) that are specific to ubifs that don't appear to be in linux-next
> as of this writing.
>
> I can include them in the fscrypt tree (which I am updating somewhat
> belatedly; sorry, crazy travel schedule has made me be late attending
> to fscrypt), but it probably makes more sense for the change to go in
> via the ubifs tree. The f2fs version of the "don't bother checking
> for encryption key" is already in linux-next, via the f2fs tree, for
> example.
>
> So I'm planning on NOT taking the ubifs-specific patches that are in
> the linux-fscrypto patch queue; unless Richard, you want to
> specifically ask me to do so.
>
The mmap and truncate patches were basically the same for each filesystem, but
yes it's fine for them to go in separately. Richard, can you take for ubifs:
ubifs: don't bother checking for encryption key in ->mmap()
ubifs: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted file
and Ted can you take for ext4:
ext4: don't bother checking for encryption key in ->mmap()
ext4: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted file
- Eric
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list