[PATCH v3 33/37] mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset
Leonard Crestez
leonard.crestez at nxp.com
Thu Apr 6 07:08:42 PDT 2017
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
>
> Some NAND controllers are using DMA engine requiring a specific
> buffer alignment. The core provides no guarantee on the nand_buffers
> pointers, which forces some drivers to allocate their own buffers
> and pass the NAND_OWN_BUFFERS flag.
>
> Rework the nand_buffers allocation logic to allocate each buffer
> independently. This should make most NAND controllers/DMA engine
> happy, and allow us to get rid of these custom buf allocation in
> NAND controller drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> @@ -4914,8 +4930,12 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > /* Free bad block table memory */
> kfree(chip->bbt);
> - if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS))
> + if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
> + kfree(chip->buffers->databuf);
> + kfree(chip->buffers->ecccode);
> + kfree(chip->buffers->ecccalc);
> kfree(chip->buffers);
> + }
It seems that chip->buffers might not be allocated at this point, for
example if nand_cleanup is called during a failed probe. You should
check if (chip->buffers != NULL) before freeing stuff inside it.
When attempting to run linux-next on various imx6qdl-sabreauto boards
they now panic on boot. This happens because they have nand chips in
devicetree which are not physically populated on the board. This
normally fails in nand_scan_ident but now crashes later in
nand_cleanup.
--
Regards,
Leonard
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list