[PATCH v4 06/14] MIPS: jz4740: DTS: Add nodes for ingenic pinctrl and gpio drivers

[Sergei Shtylyov]

On 4/3/2017 1:20 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:

>>> For a description of the pinctrl devicetree node, please read
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ingenic,pinctrl.txt
>>>
>>> For a description of the gpio devicetree nodes, please read
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/ingenic,gpio.txt
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul at crapouillou.net>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> index 3e1587f1f77a..9c23c877fc34 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,67 @@
>>>          clock-names = "rtc";
>>>      };
>>>
>>> +    pinctrl: ingenic-pinctrl at 10010000 {
>>
>>    The node name should be generic, so please rename it to something
>> like "pin-controller at ..."
>
> OK.
>
>>> +        compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-pinctrl";
>>> +        reg = <0x10010000 0x400>;
>>> +
>>> +        gpa: gpio-controller at 0 {
>>
>>    The name should be just "gpio at 0", according to ePAPR and its
>> successor spec. Although, using the <unit-address> without the "reg"
>> prop isn't allowed either...
>
> ePAPR says: "If the node has no reg property, the unit-address may be

    My copy of ePAPR 1.1 says "must be omitted". :-)

> omitted if the node name alone differentiates the node from other nodes at
> the same level in the tree."

> I could use 'gpio at bank-a', it is allowed by the spec. Or do you prefer 'gpio at 0'?

    Hm... maybe you should just use the "reg" prop.

> I'll wait from some feedback on the other patches then send a v5.
>
> Thanks,
> -Paul

MBR, Sergei