[PATCH v3 14/37] mtd: nand: denali: support "nand-ecc-strength" DT property
Masahiro Yamada
yamada.masahiro at socionext.com
Sun Apr 2 20:16:34 PDT 2017
Hi Boris,
2017-03-31 18:46 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>:
> You can try something like that when no explicit ecc.strength and
> ecc.size has been set in the DT and when ECC_MAXIMIZE was not passed.
>
> static int
> denali_get_closest_ecc_strength(struct denali_nand_info *denali,
> int strength)
> {
> /*
> * Whatever you need to select a strength that is greater than
> * or equal to strength.
> */
>
> return X;
> }
Is here anything specific to Denali?
> static int denali_try_to_match_ecc_req(struct denali_nand_info *denali)
> {
> struct nand_chip *chip = &denali->nand;
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> int max_ecc_bytes = mtd->oobsize - denali->bbtskipbytes;
> int ecc_steps, ecc_strength, ecc_bytes;
> int ecc_size = chip->ecc_step_ds;
> int ecc_strength = chip->ecc_strength_ds;
>
> /*
> * No information provided by the NAND chip, let the core
> * maximize the strength.
> */
> if (!ecc_size || !ecc_strength)
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> if (ecc_size > 512)
> ecc_size = 1024;
> else
> ecc_size = 512;
>
> /* Adjust ECC step size based on hardware support. */
> if (ecc_size == 1024 &&
> !(denali->caps & DENALI_CAP_ECC_SIZE_1024))
> ecc_size = 512;
> else if(ecc_size == 512 &&
> !(denali->caps & DENALI_CAP_ECC_SIZE_512))
> ecc_size = 1024;
>
> if (ecc_size < chip->ecc_size_ds) {
> /*
> * When the selected size if smaller than the expected
> * one we try to use the same strength but on 512 blocks
> * so that we can still fix the same number of errors
> * even if they are concentrated in the first 512bytes
> * of a 1024bytes portion.
> */
> ecc_strength = chip->ecc_strength_ds;
> ecc_strength = denali_get_closest_ecc_strength(denali,
> ecc_strength);
> } else {
> /* Always prefer 1024bytes ECC blocks when possible. */
> if (ecc_size != 1024 &&
> (denali->caps & DENALI_CAP_ECC_SIZE_1024) &&
> mtd->writesize > 1024)
> ecc_size = 1024;
>
> /*
> * Adjust the strength based on the selected ECC step
> * size.
> */
> ecc_strength = DIV_ROUND_UP(ecc_size,
> chip->ecc_step_ds) *
> chip->ecc_strength_ds;
> }
>
> ecc_bytes = denali_calc_ecc_bytes(ecc_size,
> ecc_strength);
> ecc_bytes *= mtd->writesize / ecc_size;
>
> /*
> * If we don't have enough space, let the core maximize
> * the strength.
> */
> if (ecc_bytes > max_ecc_bytes)
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> chip->ecc.strength = ecc_strength;
> chip->ecc.size = ecc_size;
>
> return 0;
> }
As a whole, this does not seem to driver-specific.
[1] A driver provides some pairs of (ecc_strength, ecc_size)
it can support.
[2] The core framework knows the chip's requirement
(ecc_strength_ds, ecc_size_ds).
Then, the core framework provides a function
to return a most recommended (ecc_strength, ecc_size).
struct nand_ecc_spec {
int ecc_strength;
int ecc_size;
};
/*
* This function choose the most recommented (ecc_str, ecc_size)
* "recommended" means: minimum ecc stregth that meets
* the chip's requirment.
*
*
* @chip - nand_chip
* @controller_ecc_spec - Array of (ecc_str, ecc_size) supported by the
controller. (terminated by NULL as sentinel)
*/
struct nand_ecc_spec * nand_try_to_match_ecc_req(struct nand_chip *chip,
struct nand_ecc_spec
*controller_ecc_spec)
{
/*
* Return the pointer to the most recommended
* struct nand_ecc_spec.
* If nothing suitable found, return NULL.
*/
}
Then, Denali driver can call it:
recommended_ecc_spec = nand_try_to_match_ecc_req(chip,
denali->ecc_spec);
if (recommended_ecc_spec) {
chip->ecc.strength = recommended_ecc_spec.ecc_strength;
chip->ecc.size = recommended_ecc_spec.ecc_size;
} else {
/*
* Do something (for example, maximize the ECC)
*/
}
It seems weird to force this to the Denali driver.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list