[PATCH v2 1/1] MAINTAINERS: add a maintainer for the SPI NOR subsystem

[Brian Norris]

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:28:00PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > On 10/19/2016 05:34 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> >> I would like to volunteer as a maintainer for the SPI NOR part of the MTD
> >> subsystem.

Thanks! I'll be happy to have the help.

[...]

> >> Also both Marek Vasut and Richard Weinberger have volunteered as well as
> >> maintainers for the SPI NOR subsystem.

Snipped all mention of Richard, since he did not volunteer :)

> >> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen at atmel.com>
> >> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com>
> 
> >
> > btw I think I'll need higher privileges in patchwork to fiddle with patches.

I expect you'll be mailing Jeremy soon then.

> >> ---
> >> ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >> - add Marek and Richard as maintainers.
> >> - add Acked-by from Boris Brezillon.
> >>
> >>
> >>  MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index 757f9c4b388d..7e63b2015072 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -11390,6 +11390,18 @@ W:   http://www.st.com/spear
> >>  S:   Maintained
> >>  F:   drivers/clk/spear/
> >>
> >> +SPI NOR SUBSYSTEM
> >> +M:   Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen at atmel.com>
> >> +M:   Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> >> +M:   Richard Weinberger <richard at nod.at>

Snipped the above line, and pushed to linux-mtd.git.

> 
> May be I was little late, but if there is any space for one more or so
> I would also like to co-maintain? Currently I am maintaining
> SPI/SPI-FLASH for u-boot and working for generic MTD (with u-boot
> driver model) + SPI-NOR addition on u-boot which eventually similar
> conceptual theory what Linux follows.

I'd be happy to add more if the others think that it's warranted. If
not, I'm sure all involved would still be happy with extra review, and
that could serve nearly the same purpose, as long as the committers
don't fall asleep like I admittedly have too often.

Regards,
Brian