[PATCH/RFC linux-mtd] mtd: sh_flctl: Remove sh7372 and device tree support

Geert Uytterhoeven geert at linux-m68k.org
Tue Nov 29 09:23:38 PST 2016


Hi Rich,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Rich Felker <dalias at libc.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:33:01AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> Commit edf4100906044225 ("ARM: shmobile: sh7372 dtsi: Remove Legacy file")
>> removed the sh7272 SoC from the kernel in v4.1.
>>
>> This patch removes support for the sh7272 SoC from the sh_flctl driver.
>> As that SoC was the only user of device tree support also remove that
>> from the driver.
>>
>> In essence it reverts commit 7c8f680e96ed ("mtd: sh_flctl: Add device tree
>> support"). This commit may be used as a reference for re-adding device
>> tree support to this driver if a need for it is found in future.
>>
>> This commit has been build-testesd against the ap325rxa_defconfig.
>> I do not have access to the hardware to perform run-time testing
>> on that board which appears to be the only remaining user of this driver.
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas at verge.net.au>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/flctl-nand.txt         | 49 ---------------
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c                        | 70 +++-------------------
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/flctl-nand.txt
>
> While I'm not the maintainer for this (and I'm not clear that the
> linux-sh list even should have been cc'd; it seems to be shmobile arm
> soc stuff rather than sh arch) I think this is a bad change. If the
> driver is completely unused, it should just be removed, but if there

Its sole remaining in-kernel user is arch/sh/boards/mach-ap325rxa/setup.c.

> are remaining users that are still using legacy platform device
> bindings, they should gradually be transitioned to device tree, and
> having the device tree support still present makes it easier to do
> that.

Enjoy converting ap325rxa to DT ;-)

> Removing the *bindings* is even worse, as these are a permanent
> interface between hardware/firmware and software.

While it is a permanent interface, it is only a git revert away...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list