[PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Fri Mar 25 01:50:15 PDT 2016
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:47:53 +0000
Peter Pan <peterpansjtu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past
> two month.
>
> Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other
> NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why
> onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c).
>
> Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable.
> We create struct nand_bbt to take place of nand_chip in nand_bbt.c.
> Struct nand_bbt contains all the information BBT needed from outside and
> it should be embedded into NAND family chip struct (such as struct nand_chip).
>
> Below is mtd folder structure we want:
> drivers/mtd/nand/<all-nand-core-code>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/<raw-nand-controller-drivers>
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/<spi-nand-code>
> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/<onenand-code>
> drivers/mtd/nand/chips/<manufacturer-spcific-code>
Hm, we should have a chips directory under each interface type, because
vendor specific handling is dependent on the NAND interface.
Otherwise, yes, that's the idea.
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list