[PATCH v4 4/8] mtd: nand: xway: use generic reset function
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Mon Jun 20 01:50:24 PDT 2016
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 19:03:01 +0200
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> wrote:
> Instead of writing an own reset function use the generic NAND reset
> function. This way we can remove our own reset function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c | 23 +++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c
> index 6028edb..8a0019a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
> #define NAND_CMD_CS BIT(4) /* chip select */
> #define NAND_CMD_SE BIT(5) /* spare area access latch */
> #define NAND_CMD_WP BIT(6) /* write protect */
> -#define NAND_WRITE_CMD_RESET 0xff
> #define NAND_WRITE_CMD (NAND_CMD_CS | NAND_CMD_CLE)
> #define NAND_WRITE_ADDR (NAND_CMD_CS | NAND_CMD_ALE)
> #define NAND_WRITE_DATA (NAND_CMD_CS)
> @@ -68,22 +67,6 @@ struct xway_nand_data {
> struct nand_chip chip;
> };
>
> -static void xway_reset_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> -{
> - unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) chip->IO_ADDR_W;
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - nandaddr &= ~NAND_WRITE_ADDR;
> - nandaddr |= NAND_WRITE_CMD;
> -
> - /* finish with a reset */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
> - writeb(NAND_WRITE_CMD_RESET, (void __iomem *) nandaddr);
> - while ((ltq_ebu_r32(EBU_NAND_WAIT) & NAND_WAIT_WR_C) == 0)
> - ;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> static void xway_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip)
> {
>
> @@ -199,14 +182,14 @@ static int xway_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> | NAND_CON_SE_P | NAND_CON_WP_P | NAND_CON_PRE_P
> | cs_flag, EBU_NAND_CON);
>
> - /* finish with a reset */
> - xway_reset_chip(&data->chip);
> -
> /* Scan to find existence of the device */
> err = nand_scan(mtd, 1);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + /* finish with a reset */
> + data->chip.cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RESET, -1, -1);
> +
Hm, I wonder if this is really useful. The NAND chip is already reset
as part of the nand_scan() process. Are you sure you need to reset it
again here?
Can you test after dropping this reset operation?
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list