[PATCH 4/8] mtd: spi-nor: disallow further writes to SR if WP# is low

Brian Norris computersforpeace at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 21:51:43 PST 2016


Locking the flash is most useful if it provides real hardware security.
Otherwise, it's little more than a software permission bit.

A reasonable use case that provides real HW security might be like
follows:

(1) hardware WP# is deasserted
(2) program flash
(3) flash range is protected via status register
(4) hardware WP# is asserted
(5) flash protection range can no longer be changed, until WP# is
    deasserted

In this way, flash protection is co-owned by hardware and software.

Now, one would expect to be able to perform step (3) with
ioctl(MEMLOCK), except that the spi-nor driver does not set the Status
Register Protect bit (a.k.a. Status Register Write Disable (SRWD)), so
even though the range is now locked, it does not satisfy step (5) -- it
can still be changed by a call to ioctl(MEMUNLOCK).

So, let's enable status register protection after the first lock
command.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index 3a08aa53c171..46da6bb706fa 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
@@ -518,6 +518,9 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 
 	status_new = (status_old & ~mask) | val;
 
+	/* Disallow further writes if WP pin is asserted */
+	status_new |= SR_SRWD;
+
 	/* Don't bother if they're the same */
 	if (status_new == status_old)
 		return 0;
-- 
1.7.9.5




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list