[PATCH 2/9] xfs: introduce and use KM_NOLOCKDEP to silence reclaim lockdep false positives

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 08:24:13AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:07:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>
> > 
> > Now that the page allocator offers __GFP_NOLOCKDEP let's introduce
> > KM_NOLOCKDEP alias for the xfs allocation APIs. While we are at it
> > also change KM_NOFS users introduced by b17cb364dbbb ("xfs: fix missing
> > KM_NOFS tags to keep lockdep happy") and use the new flag for them
> > instead. There is really no reason to make these allocations contexts
> > weaker just because of the lockdep which even might not be enabled
> > in most cases.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>
> 
> I'd suggest that it might be better to drop this patch for now -
> it's not necessary for the context flag changeover but does
> introduce a risk of regressions if the conversion is wrong.

I was just about to write in that while I didn't see anything obviously
wrong with the NOFS removals, I also don't know for sure that we can't
end up recursively in those code paths (specifically the directory
traversal thing).

--D

> Hence I think this is better as a completely separate series
> which audits and changes all the unnecessary KM_NOFS allocations
> in one go. I've never liked whack-a-mole style changes like this -
> do it once, do it properly....
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david at fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html