[PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: add a stateless method to support memory size above 128Mib
Cyrille Pitchen
cyrille.pitchen at atmel.com
Wed Dec 7 08:59:37 PST 2016
Le 07/12/2016 à 17:32, Marek Vasut a écrit :
> On 12/07/2016 05:29 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> Le 07/12/2016 à 17:20, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>>> On 12/06/2016 05:52 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>>>> This patch provides an alternative mean to support memory above 16MiB
>>>> (128Mib) by replacing 3byte address op codes by their associated 4byte
>>>> address versions.
>>>>
>>>> Using the dedicated 4byte address op codes doesn't change the internal
>>>> state of the SPI NOR memory as opposed to using other means such as
>>>> updating a Base Address Register (BAR) and sending command to enter/leave
>>>> the 4byte mode.
>>>>
>>>> Hence when a CPU reset occurs, early bootloaders don't need to be aware
>>>> of BAR value or 4byte mode being enabled: they can still access the first
>>>> 16MiB of the SPI NOR memory using the regular 3byte address op codes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen at atmel.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>>>> index 8abe134e174a..606c030c566d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>>>> @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ struct flash_info {
>>>> * bit. Must be used with
>>>> * SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK.
>>>> */
>>>> +#define SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES BIT(10) /*
>>>> + * Use dedicated 4byte address op codes
>>>> + * to support memory size above 128Mib.
>>>> + */
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> #define JEDEC_MFR(info) ((info)->id[0])
>>>> @@ -188,6 +192,91 @@ static inline struct spi_nor *mtd_to_spi_nor(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>>>> return mtd->priv;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +struct spi_nor_address_entry {
>>>> + u8 src_opcode;
>>>> + u8 dst_opcode;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static u8 spi_nor_convert_opcode(u8 opcode,
>>>> + const struct spi_nor_address_entry *entries,
>>>> + size_t num_entries)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int min, max;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * This function implements a dichotomic search in the entries[]
>>>> + * array indexed by src_opcode. Hence we assume that the entries[]
>>>> + * array is sorted by src_opcode.
>>>> + * The dichotomic search has a logarithmic complexity as opposed
>>>> + * to a simple loop on all entires, which has a linear complexity:
>>>> + * it means that when n is the number of entries in the input array,
>>>> + * the dichotomic search performs O(log2(n)) comparisons whereas
>>>> + * a simple loop performs O(n) comparisons.
>>>> + */
>>>> + min = 0;
>>>> + max = num_entries - 1;
>>>> + while (min <= max) {
>>>> + int mid = (min + max) >> 1;
>>>> + const struct spi_nor_address_entry *entry = &entries[mid];
>>>> +
>>>> + if (opcode == entry->src_opcode)
>>>> + return entry->dst_opcode;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (opcode < entry->src_opcode)
>>>> + max = mid - 1;
>>>> + else
>>>> + min = mid + 1;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> You have like 16 entries in that table, just do a linear search, this is
>>> only complex for no benefit.
>>
>> Well ok, I agree with you, it's too much overkill for what it does.
>> For readiness purpose, what about a simple and straight forward switch()
>> statement? Let's forget about cache-line and other memory/time optimizations :)
>
> If you do a switch, you cannot walk a table which you pass in, see below.
>
I meant I remove the table too, a hidden "table" would still be generated
by the compiler in the assembly code to translate the switch statement:
static u8 spi_nor_3to4_opcode(u8 3byte_address_opcode)
{
#define CASE_3TO4(_opcode) case _opcode: return _opcode##_4B
switch (3_byte_address_opcode) {
/* Without macro. */
case SPINOR_OP_PP:
return SPINOR_OP_PP_4B;
case SPINOR_OP_READ:
return SPINOR_OP_READ_4B;
case SPINOR_OP_READ_FAST:
return SPINOR_OP_READ_FAST_4B;
/* With macro. */
CASE_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ_FAST);
default:
break;
}
/* No conversion found */
return opcode;
}
For readiness, I don't whether people prefer the version with macro or the
version without. Just tell me :)
Of course with the switch statement I no longer need the struct
spi_nor_address_entry.
Also for now I don't need a 4TO3 translation.
>>>> + /* No conversion found */
>>>> + return opcode;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static u8 spi_nor_3to4_opcode(u8 opcode)
>>>> +{
>>>> + /* MUST be sorted by 3byte opcode (cf spi_nor_convert_opcode). */
>>>> +#define ENTRY_3TO4(_opcode) { _opcode, _opcode##_4B }
>>>> + static const struct spi_nor_address_entry spi_nor_3to4_table[] = {
>>>
>>> You can make this static const struct const for extra constness :-)
>>>
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_PP), /* 0x02 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ), /* 0x03 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ_FAST), /* 0x0b */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_BE_4K), /* 0x20 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_PP_1_1_4), /* 0x32 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_PP_1_4_4), /* 0x38 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ_1_1_2), /* 0x3b */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_BE_32K), /* 0x52 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ_1_1_4), /* 0x6b */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ_1_2_2), /* 0xbb */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_SE), /* 0xd8 */
>>>> + ENTRY_3TO4(SPINOR_OP_READ_1_4_4), /* 0xeb */
>>>
>>> I'd probably break this into three smaller tables, read/program/erase
>>> and then call something like:
>>>
>>> spi_nor_3to4_opcode(nor->read_opcode, read_opcode_table,
>>> ARRAY_SIZE(read_opcode_table));
>>>
>>> This would further reduce the table size (heck, it'd probably fit into a
>>> cacheline), so linear search would be more than enough.
>>>
>>>> + };
>>>> +#undef ENTRY_3TO4
>>>> +
>>>> + return spi_nor_convert_opcode(opcode, spi_nor_3to4_table,
>>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(spi_nor_3to4_table));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void spi_nor_set_4byte_opcodes(struct spi_nor *nor,
>>>> + const struct flash_info *info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + /* Do some manufacturer fixups first */
>>>> + switch (JEDEC_MFR(info)) {
>>>> + case SNOR_MFR_SPANSION:
>>>> + /* No small sector erase for 4-byte command set */
>>>> + nor->erase_opcode = SPINOR_OP_SE;
>>>> + nor->mtd.erasesize = info->sector_size;
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + default:
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + nor->read_opcode = spi_nor_3to4_opcode(nor->read_opcode);
>>>> + nor->program_opcode = spi_nor_3to4_opcode(nor->program_opcode);
>>>> + nor->erase_opcode = spi_nor_3to4_opcode(nor->erase_opcode);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /* Enable/disable 4-byte addressing mode. */
>>>> static inline int set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, const struct flash_info *info,
>>>> int enable)
>>>> @@ -1486,27 +1575,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, enum read_mode mode)
>>>> else if (mtd->size > 0x1000000) {
>>>> /* enable 4-byte addressing if the device exceeds 16MiB */
>>>> nor->addr_width = 4;
>>>> - if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SNOR_MFR_SPANSION) {
>>>> - /* Dedicated 4-byte command set */
>>>> - switch (nor->flash_read) {
>>>> - case SPI_NOR_QUAD:
>>>> - nor->read_opcode = SPINOR_OP_READ_1_1_4_4B;
>>>> - break;
>>>> - case SPI_NOR_DUAL:
>>>> - nor->read_opcode = SPINOR_OP_READ_1_1_2_4B;
>>>> - break;
>>>> - case SPI_NOR_FAST:
>>>> - nor->read_opcode = SPINOR_OP_READ_FAST_4B;
>>>> - break;
>>>> - case SPI_NOR_NORMAL:
>>>> - nor->read_opcode = SPINOR_OP_READ_4B;
>>>> - break;
>>>> - }
>>>> - nor->program_opcode = SPINOR_OP_PP_4B;
>>>> - /* No small sector erase for 4-byte command set */
>>>> - nor->erase_opcode = SPINOR_OP_SE_4B;
>>>> - mtd->erasesize = info->sector_size;
>>>> - } else
>>>> + if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SNOR_MFR_SPANSION ||
>>>> + info->flags & SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES)
>>>> + spi_nor_set_4byte_opcodes(nor, info);
>>>> + else
>>>> set_4byte(nor, info, 1);
>>>> } else {
>>>> nor->addr_width = 3;
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list