[PATCH 2/2] leds: trigger: Introduce a MTD (NAND/NOR) trigger
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Tue Apr 12 11:27:32 PDT 2016
Hi Ezequiel,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:26:35 -0300
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel at vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
> This commit introduces a MTD trigger for flash (NAND/NOR) device
> activity. The implementation is copied from IDE disk.
>
> This deprecates the "nand-disk" LED trigger, but for backwards
> compatibility, we still keep the "nand-disk" trigger around.
>
> The motivation for deprecating the "nand-disk" LED trigger is that
> it only works for NAND drivers, whereas the "mtd" LED trigger
> is more generic (in fact, "nand-disk" currently only works for
> certain NAND drivers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel at vanguardiasur.com.ar>
> ---
> drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig | 8 +++++++
> drivers/leds/trigger/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-mtd.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 7 ++++++
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 29 +---------------------
> include/linux/leds.h | 6 +++++
I'd suggest splitting this patch in 2, one adding ledtrig-mtd code, and
another one make use of ledtrig_mtd_activity() and removing
nand-trigger code.
IMHO, we should also factorize ledtrig-ide and ledtrig-mtd code
(after all, you just copied the implementation from ledtrig-ide).
How about renaming the ledtrig-ide into ledtrig-storage and
ledtrig_ide_activity() into ledtrig_storage_activity()?
You can then add a trigger named "storage" in addition to the existing
"nand-disk" and "ide-disk" ones.
Anyway, this is just a suggestion, and I let leds maintainers decide
whether this is appropriate or not.
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list