[PATCH 2/5] mtd: nand: omap2: Start dma request before enabling prefetch

Franklin S Cooper Jr. fcooper at ti.com
Wed Oct 14 06:45:22 PDT 2015



On 10/14/2015 06:41 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 13/10/15 04:38, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>> The prefetch engine sends a dma request once a FIFO threshold has
>> been met. No other requests are received until the previous request
>> is handled.
>>
>> Starting an edma transfer (dma_async_issue_pending) results in any
>> previous event for the dma channel to be cleared. Therefore, starting
>> the prefetch engine before initiating the dma transfer may result in
>> the prefetch triggering a dma request but instead of it being handled
>> it can end up being cleared. This will result in a hang since the code
>> will continue to wait for the dma request to complete.
>>
>> By initiating the dma request before enabling the prefetch engine this
>> race condition is avoided and no dma request are missed/cleared.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper at ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> index 957c32f..94d11de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>> @@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ static inline int omap_nand_dma_transfer(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *addr,
>>  	tx->callback_param = &info->comp;
>>  	dmaengine_submit(tx);
>>  
>> +	init_completion(&info->comp);
>> +	dma_async_issue_pending(info->dma);
>> +
>>  	/*  configure and start prefetch transfer */
>>  	ret = omap_prefetch_enable(info->gpmc_cs,
>>  		PREFETCH_FIFOTHRESHOLD_MAX, 0x1, len, is_write, info);
>> @@ -516,9 +519,6 @@ static inline int omap_nand_dma_transfer(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *addr,
>>  		/* PFPW engine is busy, use cpu copy method */
>>  		goto out_copy_unmap;
>>  
>> -	init_completion(&info->comp);
>> -	dma_async_issue_pending(info->dma);
>> -
>>  	/* setup and start DMA using dma_addr */
> Is the above comment misplaced after this change?
Yup you right.
>
>>  	wait_for_completion(&info->comp);
>>  	tim = 0;
>>
> cheers,
> -roger




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list