[PATCH] mtd: mtdram: check offs and len in mtdram->erase
Dongsheng Yang
yangds.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com
Fri Oct 2 02:39:02 PDT 2015
On 10/01/2015 12:41 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We should prevent user to erasing mtd device with an unaligned offset
> or length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip at vectorindia.org>
> ---
>
> I am not sure if I should add the Signed-off-by of
> Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> . He is the original author
> and he should get the credit for that.
But I had sent a a patch out to fix this problem before your v1.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-September/062234.html
Yang
>
> drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c
> index 8e28508..21b6a05 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,35 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(erase_size, "Device erase block size in KiB");
> // We could store these in the mtd structure, but we only support 1 device..
> static struct mtd_info *mtd_info;
>
> +static int check_offs_len(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + uint64_t temp_len, rem;
> +
> + /* Start address must align on block boundary */
> + temp_len = ofs;
> + rem = do_div(temp_len, mtd->erasesize);
> + if (rem) {
> + pr_debug("%s: unaligned address\n", __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Length must align on block boundary */
> + temp_len = len;
> + rem = do_div(temp_len, mtd->erasesize);
> +
> + if (rem) {
> + pr_debug("%s: length not block aligned\n", __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int ram_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
> {
> + if (check_offs_len(mtd, instr->addr, instr->len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> memset((char *)mtd->priv + instr->addr, 0xff, instr->len);
> instr->state = MTD_ERASE_DONE;
> mtd_erase_callback(instr);
>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list