[RFC PATCH 2/2] mtd: ubi: wl: avoid erasing a PEB which is empty

[Artem Bityutskiy]

A follow-up...

On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 14:33 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Did you think about putting LEBs like that to the protection queue
> > instead of playing tricks with scheduler?
> 
> Why am I playing tricks with the scheduler?

I should have replied the "1/2" e-mail, not this one, sorry. Because
this is what you seem to try ding in 1/2.

> Hmm. About which erase blocks are you talking about? The e1 which is
> the src EB and will be relocated _or_ the e2 which is the destination

I think the one which is currently unavailable. Or may be even both. I
suggest you to consider pros an cons :-)

> From what you explain it does not make sense to put e2 on the protect
> list. I just try to save here an erase cycle here.

I think if you put to the head of the PQ, that will be it.