[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Check the return value from read_sr()
Brian Norris
computersforpeace at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 13:54:43 PST 2015
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:50:24PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> We should better check the return value from read_sr() and
> propagate it in the case of error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index 12041e1..4d858f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -459,11 +459,14 @@ static int stm_is_locked_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len,
> static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
> - u8 status_old, status_new;
> + u8 status_new;
> u8 mask = SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0;
> u8 shift = ffs(mask) - 1, pow, val;
> + int status_old;
Hmm, by changing status_old from u8 to int, do we propagate any
sign-extension issues in this function? What if BIT(7) is set? If I
recall my C promotion/extension rules correctly, then I guess it's safe
(we get zero-extension, not sign-extension), but I wouldn't always put
my faith in my memory...
>
> status_old = read_sr(nor);
> + if (status_old < 0)
> + return status_old;
>
> /* SPI NOR always locks to the end */
> if (ofs + len != mtd->size) {
> @@ -509,11 +512,14 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
> - uint8_t status_old, status_new;
> + uint8_t status_new;
> + int status_old;
Same here.
> u8 mask = SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0;
> u8 shift = ffs(mask) - 1, pow, val;
>
> status_old = read_sr(nor);
> + if (status_old < 0)
> + return status_old;
>
> /* Cannot unlock; would unlock larger region than requested */
> if (stm_is_locked_sr(nor, status_old, ofs - mtd->erasesize,
> @@ -1013,6 +1019,8 @@ static int macronix_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor)
> int ret, val;
>
> val = read_sr(nor);
> + if (val < 0)
> + return val;
> write_enable(nor);
>
> write_sr(nor, val | SR_QUAD_EN_MX);
If we wanted to sidestep the issue, we could still keep status_old as
u8, but just use an 'int ret' as an intermediate place-holder, so we can
do signed error checking.
Brian
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list