Patch Issues

[nick]

Hujuianyang,
Also if I remove the function,check_free_sectors it gives me even more errors.
I tried in a second patch as part of a series.
Nick

On 2015-01-15 10:36 PM, nick wrote:
> Hujuianyang,
> Thanks for the reply. I will get around to this tomorrow.
> Nick
> 
> On 2015-01-15 10:03 PM, hujianyang wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> I'm not quite sure about if it is a correct modification. But,
>>
>> On 2015/1/16 10:18, nick wrote:
>>> drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c:336:12: warning: ‘check_free_sectors’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>
>> check if this function is still called by other functions, if it
>> is not, just remove it in your patch.
>>
>>>  static int check_free_sectors(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned int address,
>>>             ^
>>> drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c: In function ‘INFTL_formatblock’:
>>> drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c:781:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
>>>  }
>>> Patch:
>>> From 6b481c8f5030da2e9616bd038193d68340c0b5d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>   2 From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
>>>   3 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:10:37 -0500
>>>   4 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: Remove unneeded call to check_free_sectors in the
>>>   5  function,INFTL_formatblock
>>>   6 
>>>   7 Removes unneeded call to check_free_sectors internally in the function,INFTL_formatblock.
>>>   8 This call is no longer needed due to us checking to see if erasing the block against the
>>>   9 structure pointer passed to the function,inftl internal variable state is equal to the
>>>  10 macro,MTD_ERASE_FAILED to see if the block has failed in being erased successfully.Due
>>>  11 to this we can remove the no longer needed check to check_free_sectors and comments
>>>  12 related to questioning the reason for it's use with the check against MTD_ERASE_FAILED
>>>  13 for inftl's state variable already checking for successfully erasing of the mtd block.
>>>  14 
>>>  15 Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
>>>  16 ---
>>>  17  drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c | 10 ----------
>>>  18  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>  19 
>>>  20 diff --git a/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
>>>  21 index 1388c8d..def5cea 100644
>>>  22 --- a/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
>>>  23 +++ b/drivers/mtd/inftlmount.c
>>>  24 @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned int address,
>>>  25   *
>>>  26   * Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error.
>>>  27   *
>>>  28 - * ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ??
>>>  29   */
>>>  30  int INFTL_formatblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int block)
>>>  31  {
>>>  32 @@ -401,15 +400,6 @@ int INFTL_formatblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int block)
>>>  33                         goto fail;
>>>  34                 }
>>>  35 
>>>  36 -               /*
>>>  37 -                * Check the "freeness" of Erase Unit before updating metadata.
>>>  38 -                * FixMe: is this check really necessary? Since we have check
>>>  39 -                * the return code after the erase operation.
>>>  40 -                */
>>>  41 -               if (check_free_sectors(inftl, instr->addr, instr->len, 1) != 0)
>>>  42 -                       goto fail;
>>>  43 -       }
>>
>> You should keep this '}'.
>>
>>>  44 -
>>>  45         uci.EraseMark = cpu_to_le16(ERASE_MARK);
>>>  46         uci.EraseMark1 = cpu_to_le16(ERASE_MARK);
>>>  47         uci.Reserved[0] = 0;
>>>  48 -- 
>>>  49 2.1.0
>>>  50 
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________
>>> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>>>
>>
>>